Nevada Policies

State Policy Evaluation Framework

We used 11 criteria to assess state policies across three categories:

Data and Accountability

For states to make progress toward addressing chronic absenteeism, all stakeholders must have access to useful, accurate, and timely attendance data. As stewards of state data systems, state education agencies (SEAs) are best positioned to establish common definitions and collect and share this data, which should be publicly available and easily accessible so stakeholders can make targeted, strategic workforce decisions at the school, district, and state level.

Investments in Strategies to Reduce Chronic Absenteeism

To improve chronic absenteeism rates, state leaders must prioritize sustained investments and implement evidence-based strategies that address the root causes especially for students of color, students from low-income backgrounds, and students with disabilities. SEAs, in partnership with districts and communities, are uniquely positioned to allocate resources toward high-impact interventions such as wraparound services, policy agenda, improved transportation, and family engagement. These investments should be driven by data and equity, aligned with state-level goals, and monitored for effectiveness.

Eliminating Harmful Practices and Adopting Evidence-based Policies and Practices

To improve school climate, schools should eliminate discipline practices such as suspensions for disrespect, minor disruptions, dress-code violations, and other non-violent behaviors that harm the relationship between students and school. Success means removing these policies and replacing them with supportive, restorative approaches that keep students connected to leaning and contribute to their social-emotional development.

LEGEND:
  • Most supportive
  • Partially supportive
  • Least supportive

  • Data and Accountability

    • Does the state require taking daily attendance, and does it set a definition of daily attendance?

      The state requires schools to take daily attendance; however, there is no clear indication of how many hours count as a full day of attendance.

    • Does the state disaggregate chronic absenteeism and attendance data?

      The state disaggregates data by race/ethnicity, gender, English learner status, students with disabilities, economically disadvantaged status, school level (elementary, middle, and high school), and geographic level (state, district, and individual school). Data is cross-tabulated on the state site. Consecutive years are not included.

    • Does the state have attendance monitoring systems in place?

      The state uses Infinite Campus. Districts do not have standardized expectations or practices.

    • How often does the state collect chronic absenteeism data from school districts?

      The state collects chronic absenteeism data annually.

    • Is chronic absenteeism data publicly available and accessible?

      Chronic absenteeism data is publicly available on the state report card website.

    • Does the state use early warning indicators?

      The state’s early warning indicator system is designed to proactively identify students at risk of academic failure or dropping out by integrating various data points such as attendance, behavior, and academic performance. This system aligns with Nevada’s tracking and monitoring tools to facilitate timely interventions and support. The state uses Infinite Campus and the Nevada School Performance Framework.

  • Investments in Strategies to Reduce Chronic Absenteeism

    • Has the state invested in strategies to increase engagement and lower rates of chronic absenteeism?

      A portion of the Stronger Connections Grant ($8.4 million) is allotted for reducing chronic absenteeism through professional development for staff, mentoring programs for students, family and community engagement, and mental health supports. Assembly Bill 400 invests in early childhood education and literacy. Assembly Bill 54 strengthens relationships between Nevada schools and hospitals.

    • Does the state have a clear policy agenda that prioritizes the reduction of chronic absenteeism?

      The state is currently implementing five policies. Two of these policies directly address chronic absenteeism (Assembly Bill 65; Statewide policy framework and report card).

    • Are the state's investments to reduce chronic absenteeism financially sustainable?

      No evidence.

  • Harmful Practices

    • Has the state adopted evidence-based discipline guidance and policies?

      The state shifted to restorative justice (2019), Assembly Bill 65 improved the bullying definition, and Assembly Bill 330 improved school safety through discipline documentation.

    • Has the state eliminated harmful discipline practices that contribute to chronic absenteeism?

      No evidence.

Nevada Chronic Absenteeism Numbers

Understanding state policy conditions to address chronic absenteeism is one part of the story. It’s also important to review actual – timely – data on chronic absenteeism to understand attendance patterns, engage in early intervention and prevention, identify trends, allocate resources where they are needed most, and implement targeted interventions in a way that addresses root causes and meets the needs of students and their families. Timely and transparent data can also help advocates understand where to ask educators in their communities to focus efforts.

The data below presents information about chronic absenteeism rates in 2022-23, and projects how those rates would need to change to reduce chronic absenteeism by 50% over five years — overall and for individual student groups, because averages hide important details about how specific groups of students are faring. And since we can’t accept different standards for different groups, the goal displayed is for each student group to achieve the same chronic absenteeism rate as other groups.

Do you want to see the data for another state?