
Introduction
The Tool for Representational Balance in Books was created to provide curriculum publishers a framework for closely reviewing the books that make up curricular units so they may better understand how people, groups, and topics are represented. We have adapted this tool for general use by anyone, including students, parents, teachers, and community members interested in understanding what representation looks like across materials given to students. Representation has long been imbalanced in school curriculum. Groups of people that have been historically (and perpetually) marginalized in society are often invisible or negatively portrayed in the books students read.[1] Representational balance refers to a curriculum that reflects the complex and rich diversity of young people, groups, and social topics in the United States. Representational balance is a necessary component of what makes for high-quality instructional materials (HQIM). Students are more positively engaged in learning processes when materials act as mirrors and include people they can relate to, who have similar life experiences and social identities.[2] Students also benefit from exposure to materials that act as windows into the living experiences, perspectives, cultures, languages, and values of others. These forms of curriculum engagement invite students into learning and set them up for critical analysis—an alternative to materials that alienate students through their absence or stereotype threat. This tool is guidance for deep discussion and is not at all meant to produce a summative assessment of the value of a book, nor is it meant to provide justification for removing or censoring a book. We stand firm with the idea that what students need is more, not less — more information, more context, more diversity, more opportunities for making their own determinations about what is and is not valuable to them.
Domains of Representational Balance
The Tool for Representational Balance in Books consists of four domains and 10 criteria outlined in the table below. The domains position users of this tool to consider the identities of authors, illustrators, and people represented within the book, as well as the nuances with which people, groups, and historical and social topics are represented within the book. Each of the 10 criteria that make up domains II—IV has its own rubric, indicators, and examples that the user can apply to the book. Definitions of key terms accompany each of these rubrics. Users of the tool are expected to assess each book across the 10 criteria and then discuss the indicators they chose and the reason for those choices. This discussion can then inform how the user introduces the book to students, the kinds of questions that will best prompt deep thinking by the students, and any appropriate supplemental materials that will encourage deep thinking by the students.
Creator and Character Identity Who are the storytellers, and whose stories are being told?
People How are historically marginalized people included?
Groups How are historically marginalized groups included?
Topics How are historical and social topics presented?
2. Do historically marginalized people have agency?
3. Are historically marginalized people positively influential?
5. Are historically marginalized people immersed in groups and cultures?
6. Are historically marginalized groups presented positively or as having assets?
7. Are multiple groups portrayed as equally valuable?
9. Do historical and social topic presentations include historically marginalized perspectives?
10. Is there a connection between historical and social topics presentations and the real experiences of students?
People
How are historically marginalized people included?
Multidimensionality
Are historically marginalized people multidimensional ?
Indicators and Examples:
The person is not given a historically marginalized identity
The person has no or limited description and does not change
The person is described, or they undergo change
The person is described, and they undergo change
Agency
Do historically marginalized people have agency ?
Indicators and Examples:
The person is not given a historically marginalized identity
The person does not conduct major decisions or actions
The person conducts major decisions or actions with consequences only for themselves
The person conducts major decisions or actions with consequences for others
Influence
Are historically marginalized people positively influential ?
Indicators and Examples:
The person is not given a historically marginalized identity
The person is primarily described by their deficits, or they have a negative role in major decisions or actions
The person is described neutrally, or they are absent from major decisions or actions
The person is primarily described by their assets, or they have a positive role in major decisions or actions
Groups
How are historically marginalized groups included?
Stereotypes
Are historically marginalized groups represented without superficiality?
Indicators and Examples:
The text or its images include forms of superficial representation (e.g., stereotypes, counterstereotypes, tokenism, marginalizing tropes)
The text and its images do not include forms of superficial representation (e.g., stereotypes, counterstereotypes, tokenism, marginalizing tropes)
Immersion
Are historically marginalized people immersed in groups and cultures?
Indicators and Examples:
The text does not include groups or cultures that are given a historically marginalized identity
There is no description connecting a historically marginalized person to culture
There is description connecting a historically marginalized person to culture, but the description does not extend to other people
There is description connecting a historically marginalized person to culture, and the description extends to other people to present a group with a shared culture
Assets
Are historically marginalized groups presented positively or as assets ?
Indicators and Examples:
The text does not include a historically marginalized group
A historically marginalized group is portrayed negatively or as a deficit
A historically marginalized group is portrayed without explicit or implicit judgement
A historically marginalized group is portrayed positively or as an asset
Value
Are multiple groups portrayed as equally valuable?
Indicators and Examples:
The text does not include groups or cultures that could be considered marginalized
A group is portrayed as less than, subordinate to, or dependent upon another
The text focuses on a single historically marginalized group, or multiple groups are portrayed without a clear relationship to one another
Multiple groups, including a historically marginalized group, are portrayed in relationship to one another and as equally valuable
Topics
How are historical and social topics presented?
Sanitization
Are historical and social topics presented without sanitization?
Indicators and Examples:
A reader would not reasonably recognize a historical or social topic in the text
A reader would reasonably recognize a historical or social topic in the text and is presented with a version that has been sanitized
A reader would reasonably recognize a historical or social topic in the text and is presented with a version that has not been sanitized
Perspective
Do historical and social topic presentations include historically marginalized perspectives ?
Indicators and Examples:
The creator presents a topic but does not include a historically marginalized perspective
Pilgrims: A Nonfiction Companion to Magic Tree House #27 discusses pilgrims without including the context or perspective of Native Americans. The book does not identify or suggest the importance of an understanding of pilgrim colonization through the Native American perspective.
The creator does not present any historical or social topics, or topics are included with ambiguity
The creator presents a historical or social topic, and it is presented through a historically marginalized perspective
The creator presents a historical or social topic through multiple perspectives, including a historically marginalized perspective
Connection
Is there a connection between historical and social topics presentations and the real experiences of students?
Indicators and Examples:
The creator presents a historical or social topic as solved, as an issue exclusively of the past, or as an individual problem
The creator does not present any historical or social topics, or topics are included with ambiguity
The creator presents a historical or social topic as complex, as an issue of the past and present, or as linked to structures like laws and events
Definitions
Description
The person is described if the author describes or implies through text or illustration an internal or psychological aspect of character (e.g., emotions, beliefs, perspectives, motivations, etc.) that helps the reader understand this person as an individual (e.g., an aspect of character that will follow them across situations, that reflects continuity; “she was meticulous”).
Change
Change builds on description, in that internal, continuous aspects of character change as the story develops (e.g., dynamic characterization).[3]
Major Decisions or Actions
Major decisions (or actions) would change the developing story if they were removed. The decision (or action) is “major” because it has an effect beyond the singular instance; it “ripples” and contributes to a drive toward the plot’s climax (or toward a climax in a subplot).
Consequences
Consequences are the observable effects of major decisions (or actions).
Deficits
The connotative aspect of a person’s, group’s, or culture’s description that is primarily negative or that emphasizes flaws, such as weaknesses, obstacles, uncertainty, ignorance, etc.
Assets
The connotative aspect of a person’s, group’s, or culture’s description that is primarily positive or that emphasizes assets, such as strengths, talents, knowledge, etc.
Positive Role
The positive influence a person has on other people, their environment, situations, general story development, and major decisions or actions. For example, the person may support the growth of others, serve as a heroic figure, or identify solutions when conflict arises.
Negative Role
The negative influence a person has on other people, their environment, situations, general story development, and major decisions or actions. For example, the person may impede the growth of others, serve as a villainous figure, or complicate solutions when conflict arises.
Stereotypes
Widely held oversimplifications that undermine the complex attributes of a group’s membership.
Counterstereotypes
“Polar opposites” to stereotypes that depend on and often perpetuate widely held simplifications.
Tokenism
The superficial inclusion of an individual from a distinct group.
Marginalizing Tropes
Commonly recurring literary devices, motifs, or cliches that perpetuate a widely held oversimplification, particularly in lieu of complex representation. Myriad examples include the “brown-skinned child,” the “disposable woman,” or the use of anthropomorphism in children’s books.
Culture
The “[…] behaviors and values that are learned, shared, and exhibited by a group of people.”[4] The behaviors and values (also knowledge and perspectives) that are shared by members of a group, and sharing is clearly communicated by the author or illustrator.
Connecting Description
Description (textual or visual) that demonstrates that the person shares in the behaviors, values, knowledge, or perspectives that are also shared amongst other members of a group.
Historical and Social Topics
- Descriptions that tell the story of people broadly (the “what” or the “what was” of human relationships or with the world in which we live, i.e., environmental concerns).
- Descriptions that make implicit or explicit assertions about human relationships (the “how” or “how things ought to be” for human relationships, e.g., a story that implies Sudanese villages with limited clean water supplies can be saved through the intervention of relief organizations).
Sanitization
Presenting a historical or social topic in a way that appears to have unpleasant, undesirable, or unfavorable aspects removed, hidden, or minimized.[5]
Perspective
A frame for processing and understanding topics that an author or illustrator presents to the reader, often through people (or narration).
Solved
Implicitly or explicitly asserting that social or historical issues have been resolved or are exclusively linked to the past with no influence on the present.
Individual
Implicitly or explicitly asserting that social or historical issues are the problem of or are solved by individuals (e.g., a “pull yourself up by the bootstraps” narrative).
- Thomas, D., & Dyches, J. (2019). The hidden curriculum of reading intervention: A critical content analysis of Fountas & Pinnell’s leveled literacy intervention. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(5), 601-618.
- Armstrong, A. L. (2021, December 1). The representation of social groups in U.S. educational materials and why it matters: A research overview. New America. https://www.newamerica.org/education-policy/reports/the-representation-of-social-groups-in-u-s-educational-materials-and-why-it-matter/
- Baldick, C. (2015). Characterization. In The Oxford dictionary of literary terms(4thed.). Oxford University Press.
- Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 8(1), 69-91.
- Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Sanitize. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sanitize